class: center, middle, inverse, title-slide .title[ # Misperceived Discrimination ] .author[ ### Merlin Schaeffer ] .date[ ### 2024-06-04 ] --- layout: true class: clear # Perceived Prevalence .font50[How prevalent is discrimination (mis-)perceived to be?] .left-column[ <img src="./media/Janus.webp" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.backgrnote[*Source*: ChatGPT 4]] ] ??? - Second dimension of Contested Discrimination: Competing views `\(rightarrow\)` competing perceived prevalences. - Two examples that are not directly related but represent my curiosity on the topic: + According to both black/women and men/white people, relations have considerably deteriorated in the US. + Note that Male/white perspective is ambiguous. - Still, the question is: Have things really been better in 2001? --- .right-column[ <img src="./media/Gender.png" width="64%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> <img src="./media/Race.png" width="64%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.backgrnote[*Source*: [Gallup](https://news.gallup.com/poll/1687/race-relations.aspx)]] ] ??? - A divergence of perceptions is more obvious when it comes to the topic of my work. - ChatGPT graphic: 1. How come that the same reality may be perceived so differently? 2. Is there also a trend over time? 3. How do these perceptions deviate from "reality"? --- .right-column[ <img src="./media/TV2.png" width="65%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.backgrnote[*Source*: [TV2](https://nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2021-06-07-flere-danskere-ser-racisme-som-et-udbredt-problem)]] <img src="./media/Menneske.png" width="65%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.backgrnote[*Source*: [Institut for Menneske Rettigheder](chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://menneskeret.dk/files/media/document/Oplevet%20etnisk%20diskrimination%20i%20Danmark.pdf)]] ] --- .right-column[ | Social Mechanism | Minority | Majority | |-----------|------------|--------| | Divergent *Awareness* | Integration `\(\rightarrow\)` awareness of group's enduring marginalized status. | Minority integration `\(\rightarrow\)` impression of successful diversification of society. | | Divergent *Definition* | Claim to equality `\(\rightarrow\)` increased sensitivity & confidence to interpret subtle events as discrimination. | Maintain way of life and privileges `\(\rightarrow\)` set high standards for what constitutes discrimination and be accused of it. | | Divergent *Opportunity Structure* | ... there are `\(\frac{93}{7} = 13.3\)` in which a minority experiences it. | For every interaction in which a majority member engages in or witnesses discrimination, ... <br> `\(\leftarrow\)` | ] ??? - Three social mechanisms could explain a trend of divergence. - **Do the 3 mechanisms drive perceptions away from "reality"?** - The field lacks a methodology to measure misperceptions of discrimination – a crucial barrier. - **Remainder of talk: My experimentation with various methods** to measure misperceptions of discrimination. + But **no answer yet**, whether these three social mechanisms drive them! --- layout: false class: clear .content-box-blue[.center[ **How accurate do majority and minority citizens <br> perceive ethno-racial discrimination?** ]] .left-column[ <br> <br> .center[We cannot observe <br> *hidden* intentions.] <img src="https://www.skolske.sk/storage/article/780x520_1588025770_article.jpg" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] .right-column[ .push-left[ <br> <img src="media/Black_Female_Caller2.png" width="35%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] .push-right[ <br> <img src="media/White_Female_Caller.png" width="35%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] <img src="./media/Obv_example.png" width="75%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.backgrnote[*Source*: Schaeffer, Krakowski, Romarri, and Rosenberg (2024)]] .center[.font90[ `\(\rightarrow\)` **Price**: .alert[Fictitious cases] identify discrimination in the .alert[aggregate]! ]]] --- class: inverse middle center # Misperceived *Prevalence* of Discrimination <br> <br> .content-box-green[ **Claim 1**: Majority citizens tend to *over*perceive prevalence of minority discrimination. **Claim 2**: Lack of awareness does not explain low support for anti-discrimination legislation. ] ??? - First method: Misperceived prevalence. - Focus on majority members: Native-born Danes with native-born parents. --- # Misperceived *Prevalence* .center[ <img src="./media/Merlin1.png" width="50%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .backgrnote[*Source*: Schaeffer, Krakowski, and Olsen (2023)] ] ??? - Inspired by two economists: We explain field experiment and ask people what outcome they suspect. --- # Misperceived *Prevalence* .right-column[ .center[ <img src="./media/all_misp-2.png" width="85%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .backgrnote[*Source*: Schaeffer, Krakowski, and Olsen (2023). Post-stratification weighted results. `\(n_{\text{Hiring}} = 1,045\)`, `\(n_{\text{Housing}} = 1,041\)`, `\(n_{\text{Politics}} = 1,043\)`, and `\(n_{\text{Schools}} = 1,041\)` mainstream-majority Danes. ]]] ??? - We did this with all filed experiments conducted in DK so far: Peter, Asmus, etc. - Let me help you interpret this. -- .left-column[ <img src="./media/PredictPrev.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] ??? - In contrast to 3 mechanisms: No evidence of vested interest in perceiving little discrimination. + Even among those who are against immigration! + Only education: We academics are more off! --- # Misperceived *Prevalence* .push-left[ <img src="./media/HaalandRoth.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.backgrnote[*Source*: Haaland and Roth (2023)]] ] ??? - Same in the US for discrimination against Black people. -- .push-left[ <img src="./media/Schaerer.png" width="70%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.backgrnote[*Source*: Schaerer, du Plessis, Nguyen, van Aert, Tiokhin, Lakens, Giulia Clemente, Pfeiffer, Dreber, Johannesson, Clark, and Luis Uhlmann (2023)]] ] ??? - Same for how prevalent we believe gender discrimination to be. --- layout: false # Factural Correction <img src="./media/Fig5_Correction_a.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .backgrnote[.center[*Source*: Schaeffer, Krakowski, and Olsen (2023); Post-stratification weighted results. n = 769.]] ??? - Unsurprisingly, informing people about the actual result, does not change their recognition of the problem. + Not even among those who underestimated the extent of discrimination. --- class: clear # Divergent Definition? .push-left[ <img src="./media/Fig5_Correction_a1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .backgrnote[.center[*Source*: Schaeffer, Krakowski, and Olsen (2023); Post-stratification weighted results. n = 769.]] ] .push-right[ .left-column[ <br> <img src="./media/Krarup1.png" width="80%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] .right-column[ <br> <img src="./media/Krarup2.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.backgrnote[*Source*: Østergaard (2020)]] ] .center[ <iframe width="500" height="290" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HNU_4nEnPNc?si=1tyj-xGYI-rVKcOO" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe> ]] ??? - But maybe the causality runs the other way around: + Because its not seen as unjust, it is prevalent? --- class: inverse middle center # Mis*expected* *Personal* Discrimination <br> <br> .content-box-green[ **Claim 3**: Typically, people do not expect ethno-racial discrimination, <br>but when they do, their expectations tend to be wrong. **Claim 4**: Perceived and expected discrimination are costly. ] ??? - I initially started thinking about this 10 years ago. - My original question was another one: Are there negative consequences of perceiving too much discrimination? + Does it make you unhappy beyond actual reason for it? - Personal discrimination: **Do _you_ misperceive the discrimination that _you_ experience?** - Much more difficult: Actual: **Repeated experimental observations** for **real people who can have perceptions**! --- class: clear # Central Idea .font70[Mutual evaulation in behavioral games] .left-column[ `\(\rightarrow\)` Observe **actual €** sent. `\(\rightarrow\)` Survey **expected €** received. <br> <br> .alert[.center[True first name & city of residence from registers]]<br> .backgrnote[Alisina, Ahmad, Anne, Binyamin, Joyce, Somaia, Sarah, Hayriye, Saibe, Björn, Salem, Fabienne, Sadet, Linda, Margarita, Ali, Joseph, Mhd Kheir, Baran, Bahaa, Jebran, Reno, Seiji, Irina, Ajsel, Christine, Rahim, Yaw Abrefa, Mark, Anjali Dev, Elmar, Anke, Laura, Heiko, ...] ] .right-column[ <br> <br> <br> <br> <img src="./media/Sender-en.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] ??? - Uni of observation is an interaction, not a person! --- # LLM-based Coding of Names .push-left[ <img src="./media/HuggingFace.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .font80[ ``` r library(text) # Predict ethnicity of first names. zeroshot_ethnic <- text::textZeroShot( # The list of first names to be predicted. sequences = vornamen, # sequences = vornamen[1:20], # The possible origins for the first names. candidate_labels = c( "deutscher", "muslimischer", "türkischer", "ostasiatischer", "osteuropäischer", "christlicher"), # Indicates whether multiple genders should be predicted for each first name. multi_label = TRUE, # The template for the hypothesis that is generated for each first name. hypothesis_template = "Das ist ein {} Vorname.", # The model that is used to predict the gender. # model = "MoritzLaurer/mDeBERTa-v3-base-mnli-xnli") %>% model = "michaelp11/zeroshot-classification-de") %>% # Renames the column `sequences` to `vorname`. rename(vorname = sequence) ``` ]] -- .push-right[ <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-22-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- # 10 Trust Games per Participant .push-left[.font80[ - *Majority participants*: + 3 games with mainstream players. + 7 games with immigrant origin players. - *Immigrant origin participants*: + 7 games with mainstream players. + 3 games with immigrant origin players. `\(\rightarrow\)` Observe **actual €** sent to others. <table class="table" style="color: black; width: auto !important; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"> <thead> <tr> <th style="text-align:left;"> Name </th> <th style="text-align:right;"> N </th> <th style="text-align:right;"> % </th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Majority with German name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 10650 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 53.0 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with Christian name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 330 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 1.6 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with East-Asian name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 1310 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 6.5 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with East-European name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 1640 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 8.2 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with German name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 3430 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 17.1 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with Muslim name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 2110 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 10.5 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with Turkish name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 630 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 3.1 </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> ]] ??? - Scientist: Repeated observations. -- .push-right[ <img src="media/Sender-en.png" width="80%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-26-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] ??? - Explain: Dots, groups, boxplots, main message. - Immigrants entrusted their game partner's a bit less. + Later: This is partly driven by reports of past discrimination & expected discrimination. --- # Entrusted € .font60[By game partner] .push-left[ - *Majority participants*: + 3 games with mainstream players. + .backgrnote[7 games with immigrant origin players.] - *Immigrant origin participants*: + 7 games with mainstream players. + .backgrnote[3 games with immigrant origin players.] `\(\rightarrow\)` Observe **actual €** sent to others. <table class="table" style="color: black; width: auto !important; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"> <thead> <tr> <th style="text-align:left;"> Name </th> <th style="text-align:right;"> N </th> <th style="text-align:right;"> % </th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Majority with German name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 3137 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 37.3 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with East-Asian name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 922 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 11.0 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with German name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 2414 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 28.7 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with Muslim name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 1484 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 17.7 </td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:left;"> Minority with Turkish name </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 445 </td> <td style="text-align:right;"> 5.3 </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> ] .push-right[ <img src="media/Sender-en.png" width="80%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-30-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] ??? What did their game partner's entrust them? - Now focus on games with mainstream partners. --- # LLM-coded connotations & trust <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-31-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Actual Trust Discrimination .font60[By game partner] .left-column[ `$$\text{Act Discr}_{ij} = €_{ij} - \bar{€}_{j\text{(Germ. name)}}$$` ] .right-column[ <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-32-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] --- class: clear # After the 10 Games .font60[Expectations to be discriminated] <img src="media/Perception-en.png" width="78%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Actual vs. Expected Discrimination <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/plot_actperc_1-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Actual vs. Expected Discrimination <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/plot_actperc_2-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- # Actual vs. Expected Discrimination <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/plot_actperc_3-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- class: clear # The Cost of Perceived and Expected Discrimination .push-right[ <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-34-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] -- .push-left[ <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-35-1.png" width="100%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> .center[.font90[ `\((-0.488€ + -0.113€) \times 3 \times \frac{2}{3} \times 2 = -2.4€\)` `\(\frac{-2.4€}{20€} = \color{red}{-12\%}\)` ]]] --- class: inverse middle center # Mis*perceived Personal* Discrimination .push-left[ <br> <br> <img src="https://www.wenzelfenton.com/wp-content/themes/FoundationPress/assets/images/what-is-employment-discrimination-feature.jpg" width="80%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> ] .push-right[ <br> <br> .content-box-green[ **Claim 6**: People tend to overinterpret ambiguous signals as evidence of discrimination. **Claim 7**: Majority members overinterpret signals of advantage more than minorities overinterpret signals of disadvantage. ]] --- # Follow-up Experiment .font60[Disadvantage cue] **On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 6 € to you.** In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German. Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German. **On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 8 € to these three persons:** Annegret from Hamburg Klaus from Berlin Hartmut from München **The three have thus received 2 € more than you. How do you rate this result?** <select class='webex-select'><option value='blank'></option><option value='answer'>My name played a role: I was disadvantaged by my game partners.</option><option value=''>My name did not play a role: I was simply unlucky</option></select> --- # Follow-up Experiment .font60[Advantage cue] **On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 8 € to you.** In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German. Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German. **On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 6 € to these three persons:** Annegret from Hamburg Klaus from Berlin Hartmut from München **The three have thus received 2 € less than you. How do you rate this result?** <select class='webex-select'><option value='blank'></option><option value='answer'>My name played a role: I was advantaged by my game partners.</option><option value=''>My name did not play a role: I was simply lucky.</option></select> --- # Follow-up Experiment .font60[Equality cue] **On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 7 € to you.** In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German. Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German. **On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 7 € to these three persons:** Annegret from Hamburg Klaus from Berlin Hartmut from München **The three have thus received the same amount as. How do you rate this result?** <select class='webex-select'><option value='blank'></option><option value='answer'>My name played a role: In this case I nevertheless received the same.</option><option value=''>My name did not play a role: I was treated equally by my game partners.</option></select> --- layout: true # My Name Played a Role ... --- <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-37-1.png" width="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-38-1.png" width="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-39-1.png" width="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- layout: true # Accurate Perception .font60[My name played a role] --- <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/plot_accurate1_1-1.png" width="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/plot_accurate1_2-1.png" width="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/plot_accurate1_3-1.png" width="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- <img src="Aarhus_files/figure-html/plot_accurate1_4-1.png" width="90%" style="display: block; margin: auto;" /> --- layout: false # Conclusion .font70[for now ...] .push-left[ <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> .font140[.center[ .alert[Thank you for your attention!] ]]] .push-right[.content-box-green[ **Claim 1**: Majority citizens tend to overperceive prevalence of minority discrimination. **Claim 2**: Lack of awareness does not explain low support for anti-discrimination legislation. **Claim 3**: Typically, people do not expect ethno-racial discrimination, but when they do, their expectations tend to be wrong. **Claim 4**: Perceived and expected discrimination are costly. **Claim 5**: People tend to overinterpret ambiguous signals as evidence of discrimination. **Claim 6**: Majority members overinterpret signals of advantage more than minorities overinterpret signals of disadvantage. ]] --- layout: false count: false # References .push-left[.font70[ Haaland, I. and C. Roth (2023). "Beliefs About Racial Discrimination and Support for Pro-Black Policies". In: _Review of Economics and Statistics_, pp. 40-53. Østergaard, A. (2020). _Detektor: Efter racismedebat – Dansk Folkeparti anerkender forskelsbehandling_. Schaeffer, M., K. Krakowski, and A. L. Olsen (2023). "Correcting Misperceptions about Ethno-Racial Discrimination: The Limits of Evidence-Based Awareness Raising to Promote Support for Equal-Treatment Policies". In: _SocArXiv_. Schaeffer, M., K. Krakowski, A. Romarri, et al. (2024). "Far-right Electoral Success Exacerbates Administrative Discrimination Against Minorities: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Italy". In: _Unpublished manuscript_. Schaerer, M., C. du Plessis, M. H. B. Nguyen, et al. (2023). "On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions". In: _Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes_, p. 104280. ]] .push-right[.font70[ ]] --- count: false .push-left[.font70[ <br> ]] .push-right[.font70[ <br> ]]