Misperceived Discrimination
How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive discrimination?
Merlin Schaeffer & Judith Kas
2022-10-24
1 / 28

How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive ethnic discrimination?

Challenges

No aggregate analysis: Measure actual and perceived discrimination for individuals.

Ethics: Researchers must not discriminate participants.

2 / 28

Central idea Mutual evaulation in behavioral games

Two players' mutual evaluation.
Clear metric: €.

$\to$ Observe actual € sent.

$\to$ Survey expected € received.

True first name & city of residence from registers
Alisina, Ahmad, Anne, Binyamin, Joyce, Somaia, Sarah, Hayriye, Saibe, Björn, Salem, Fabienne, Sadet, Linda, Margarita, Ali, Joseph, Mhd Kheir, Baran, Bahaa, Jebran, Reno, Seiji, Irina, Ajsel, Christine, Rahim, Yaw Abrefa, Mark, Anjali Dev, Elmar, Anke, Laura, Heiko, ...

3 / 28

10 Trust games per participant

Mainstream¹ participants:
- 3 games with mainstream players.
- 7 games with immigrant origin players.

Immigrant origin² participants:
- 7 games with mainstream players.
- 3 games with immigrant origin players.

$\to$ Observe actual € sent to others.

1: Born in Germany and both parents born in Germany.
2: Born abroad or at least one parent born abroad.

4 / 28

Sample

1 Pre-game survey Jul-Oct '21 $\to$ 2 Trust games Nov-Dec '21 $\to$ 3 Pay-out experiment Mar '22

Stratified random sample from German registers.
Invitation via postal mail.
Online surveys/games in German.
Response rate approx. 12%-4%.

imor		Hamburg	Köln	Frankfurt am Main	München	Berlin	All
Mainstream	N	198	222	204	184	243	1051
	% row	18.8	21.1	19.4	17.5	23.1	100.0
Immigrant	N	118	90	113	153	101	575
	% row	20.5	15.7	19.7	26.6	17.6	100.0
Child of immigrant	N	66	100	61	84	72	383
	% row	17.2	26.1	15.9	21.9	18.8	100.0
All	N	382	412	378	421	416	2009
	% row	19.0	20.5	18.8	21.0	20.7	100.0

5 / 28

Actual trust discrimination by game partner

${Act Discr}_{i j} = €_{i j} - {\bar{€}}_{j (Germ. name)}$

6 / 28

Actual trust discrimination avg. by person

${\bar{Act Discr}}_{i} = \frac{\sum_{j = 1}^{n_{j}} {Act Discr}_{i j}}{n_{j}}$

7 / 28

Perceived discrimination

Do immigrant minorities (mis-)perceive discrimination when they asked to frame a cue of ethnic inequality?

8 / 28

Pay-out experiment Disadvantage cue

On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 6 € to you.

In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German.

Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German.

On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 8 € to these three persons:

Annegret from Hamburg

Klaus from Berlin

Hartmut from München

The three have thus received 2 € more than you. How do you rate this result?

9 / 28

Pay-out experiment Advantage cue

On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 8 € to you.

In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German.

Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German.

On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 6 € to these three persons:

Annegret from Hamburg

Klaus from Berlin

Hartmut from München

The three have thus received 2 € less than you. How do you rate this result?

10 / 28

Pay-out experiment Equality cue

On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 7 € to you.

In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German.

Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German.

On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 7 € to these three persons:

Annegret from Hamburg

Klaus from Berlin

Hartmut from München

The three have thus received the same amount as. How do you rate this result?

11 / 28

May name played a role ...

12 / 28

May name played a role ...

13 / 28

May name played a role ...

14 / 28

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

15 / 28

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

16 / 28

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

17 / 28

But how accurate are these perceptions?

About: whether their name did (not) play a role?
About whether Merlins were generally:
(today focus on) disadvantaged?

18 / 28

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

19 / 28

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

20 / 28

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

21 / 28

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

22 / 28

Accurate perceptions People called like me

23 / 28

Accurate perceptions People called like me

24 / 28

Accurate perceptions People called like me

25 / 28

Accurate perceptions People called like me

26 / 28

Complex data and no blueprint ...

27 / 28

Conclusion for now ...Immigrant minorities with a German-sounding name perceive advantage ≈≈ those with a non-German name perceive disadvantage.

They generalize personal experience to equivalent others ≈≈ 1:1.

They seem somewhat better than random at perceiving ethnic discrimination.Especially the absence of it!
(... in the absence of obvious racial slurs etc.)

28 / 28

Conclusion for now ...

Immigrant minorities with a German-sounding name perceive advantage $\approx$ those with a non-German name perceive disadvantage.

They generalize personal experience to equivalent others $\approx$ 1:1.

They seem somewhat better than random at perceiving ethnic discrimination.
- Especially the absence of it!
- (... in the absence of obvious racial slurs etc.)

Thank you for your attention!

Please contact me,
if you have alternative ideas on how these data can be used and would like to team-up

28 / 28

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

↑, ←, Pg Up, k

Go to previous slide

↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j

Go to next slide

Home

Go to first slide

End

Go to last slide

Number + Return

Go to specific slide

b / m / f

Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode

Clone slideshow

Toggle presenter mode

Restart the presentation timer

?, h

Toggle this help

Tile View: Overview of Slides

Misperceived Discrimination
How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive discrimination?
Merlin Schaeffer & Judith Kas
2022-10-24
1 / 28

How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive ethnic discrimination?

Challenges

No aggregate analysis: Measure actual and perceived discrimination for individuals.

Ethics: Researchers must not discriminate participants.

2 / 28

Central idea Mutual evaulation in behavioral games

Two players' mutual evaluation.
Clear metric: €.

$\to$ Observe actual € sent.

$\to$ Survey expected € received.

3 / 28

10 Trust games per participant

Mainstream¹ participants:
- 3 games with mainstream players.
- 7 games with immigrant origin players.

Immigrant origin² participants:
- 7 games with mainstream players.
- 3 games with immigrant origin players.

$\to$ Observe actual € sent to others.

1: Born in Germany and both parents born in Germany.
2: Born abroad or at least one parent born abroad.

4 / 28

Sample

1 Pre-game survey Jul-Oct '21 $\to$ 2 Trust games Nov-Dec '21 $\to$ 3 Pay-out experiment Mar '22

Stratified random sample from German registers.
Invitation via postal mail.
Online surveys/games in German.
Response rate approx. 12%-4%.

imor		Hamburg	Köln	Frankfurt am Main	München	Berlin	All
Mainstream	N	198	222	204	184	243	1051
	% row	18.8	21.1	19.4	17.5	23.1	100.0
Immigrant	N	118	90	113	153	101	575
	% row	20.5	15.7	19.7	26.6	17.6	100.0
Child of immigrant	N	66	100	61	84	72	383
	% row	17.2	26.1	15.9	21.9	18.8	100.0
All	N	382	412	378	421	416	2009
	% row	19.0	20.5	18.8	21.0	20.7	100.0

5 / 28

Actual trust discrimination by game partner

${Act Discr}_{i j} = €_{i j} - {\bar{€}}_{j (Germ. name)}$

6 / 28

Actual trust discrimination avg. by person

${\bar{Act Discr}}_{i} = \frac{\sum_{j = 1}^{n_{j}} {Act Discr}_{i j}}{n_{j}}$

7 / 28

Perceived discrimination

Do immigrant minorities (mis-)perceive discrimination when they asked to frame a cue of ethnic inequality?

8 / 28

Pay-out experiment Disadvantage cue

On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 6 € to you.

In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German.

Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German.

On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 8 € to these three persons:

Annegret from Hamburg

Klaus from Berlin

Hartmut from München

The three have thus received 2 € more than you. How do you rate this result?

9 / 28

Pay-out experiment Advantage cue

On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 8 € to you.

In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German.

Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German.

On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 6 € to these three persons:

Annegret from Hamburg

Klaus from Berlin

Hartmut from München

The three have thus received 2 € less than you. How do you rate this result?

10 / 28

Pay-out experiment Equality cue

On average, your ten game partners sent and thereby entrusted 7 € to you.

In addition, your ten game partners played trust games with other 68 more participants. 25 of these other participants had names that sound typically German.

Below you see a selection of three of these participants with names that sound typically German.

On average, your game partners sent and thereby entrusted 7 € to these three persons:

Annegret from Hamburg

Klaus from Berlin

Hartmut from München

The three have thus received the same amount as. How do you rate this result?

11 / 28

May name played a role ...

12 / 28

May name played a role ...

13 / 28

May name played a role ...

14 / 28

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

15 / 28

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

16 / 28

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

17 / 28

But how accurate are these perceptions?

About: whether their name did (not) play a role?
About whether Merlins were generally:
(today focus on) disadvantaged?

18 / 28

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

19 / 28

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

20 / 28

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

21 / 28

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

22 / 28

Accurate perceptions People called like me

23 / 28

Accurate perceptions People called like me

24 / 28

Accurate perceptions People called like me

25 / 28

Accurate perceptions People called like me

26 / 28

Complex data and no blueprint ...

27 / 28

Conclusion for now ...Immigrant minorities with a German-sounding name perceive advantage ≈≈ those with a non-German name perceive disadvantage.

They generalize personal experience to equivalent others ≈≈ 1:1.

They seem somewhat better than random at perceiving ethnic discrimination.Especially the absence of it!
(... in the absence of obvious racial slurs etc.)

28 / 28

Conclusion for now ...

Immigrant minorities with a German-sounding name perceive advantage $\approx$ those with a non-German name perceive disadvantage.

They generalize personal experience to equivalent others $\approx$ 1:1.

They seem somewhat better than random at perceiving ethnic discrimination.
- Especially the absence of it!
- (... in the absence of obvious racial slurs etc.)

Thank you for your attention!

Please contact me,
if you have alternative ideas on how these data can be used and would like to team-up

28 / 28

Misperceived Discrimination

How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive discrimination?

Merlin Schaeffer & Judith Kas

2022-10-24

How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive ethnic discrimination?

Central idea Mutual evaulation in behavioral games

10 Trust games per participant

Sample

Actual trust discrimination by game partner

Actual trust discrimination avg. by person

Perceived discrimination

Pay-out experiment Disadvantage cue

Pay-out experiment Advantage cue

Pay-out experiment Equality cue

May name played a role ...

May name played a role ...

May name played a role ...

"Were participants called Merlin generally advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

But how accurate are these perceptions?

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

Accurate perceptions People called like me

Accurate perceptions People called like me

Accurate perceptions People called like me

Accurate perceptions People called like me

Complex data and no blueprint ...

Conclusion for now ...

Conclusion for now ...

How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive ethnic discrimination?

Help

Misperceived Discrimination

Misperceived Discrimination

How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive discrimination?

Merlin Schaeffer & Judith Kas

2022-10-24

How accurate do persons of immigrant origin perceive ethnic discrimination?

Central idea Mutual evaulation in behavioral games

10 Trust games per participant

Sample

Actual trust discrimination by game partner

Actual trust discrimination avg. by person

Perceived discrimination

Pay-out experiment Disadvantage cue

Pay-out experiment Advantage cue

Pay-out experiment Equality cue

May name played a role ...

May name played a role ...

May name played a role ...

"Were participants called Merlin generally advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

But how accurate are these perceptions?

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

Accurate perceptions My name played a role

Accurate perceptions People called like me

Accurate perceptions People called like me

Accurate perceptions People called like me

Accurate perceptions People called like me

Complex data and no blueprint ...

Conclusion for now ...

Conclusion for now ...

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"

"Were participants called Merlin generally
advantaged, treated equally, or disadvantaged by their game partners?"