Click here to see the slides for the presentation at the Department Conference, internal KOP meeting, Nuffied College, University of Oxford, and the Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University.

Abstract: Social science research has produced evidence of an ‘integration paradox’: Perceived discrimination among immigrants and their descendants is stronger, the better their access to mainstream middle-class society as broadly indicated by their education, length of residence, or generational status. Social scientists have proposed several explanations of these counter-intuitive patterns and produced a rich assembly of mixed empirical evidence. To identify which reliable insights this line of research has produced across the various samples and measures utilized, this study presents the first (pre-registered) meta-analytic review of the integration paradox. As a review, the first contribution of this study is to systematize key theoretical arguments put forward in the integration paradox literature into a coherent theoretical synthesis. As our second contribution we then assess the reliability of the evidence in favor of the theoretical claims made in the literature, by using recent developments in multilevel meta-analysis. We pre-register this meta-analysis after an initial coding of four studies, which we use as pilot sample to calibrate the coding scheme, data processing (e.g., derivation of comparable effect sizes), and analyses. Yet, we also identify a fundamental flaw: Prior research suggests systematic under-perceptions of discrimination among the less integrated but lacks a measure of actual discrimination to assess this assumption. I will conclude my talk by elaborating on a new (trust game) experimental research design that overcomes this problem and allows to measure individual-level mis-perceptions of discrimination. We currently implement this novel experimental design among a random sample 3,000 persons living in one of Germany’s five largest cities.

Does increased access to and blending with mainstream middle-class society (as broadly indicated by education, length of residency, or generational status) predict higher levels of perceived discrimination among persons of immigrant origin? Note: Forest plot of 20 partial correlation coefficients and the overall meta-estimate with associated 90 and 95% confidence intervals. The estimates indicate the relationship between broad indicators of immigrant integration (education, generation, or length or residence) and perceived discrimination.